For everybody out there who is thinking about buying an electric vehicle, I want to save some of you from a lifetime of regret.
Oh, sure; electric automobiles are perfectly fine if your travels keep you close to home. And there is a seemingly endless parade of people these days who will tell you that electric vehicles (EVs) are far superior to cars that are powered by an internal combustion engine (ICE). But are they really?
Well … the truth is, once you get past the hype and separate wishful thinking from reality, it’s easy to see that electric vehicles are inferior to their under-appreciated, unjustly-maligned ICE counterparts in many important ways — which is probably why one in five people who purchase an electric vehicle in California eventually abandon the technology.
With that in mind, here are more than a few good reasons why the hype about electric vehicles isn’t what it’s cracked up to be:
1. Range … or lack thereof. Thanks to technological improvements, the median electric vehicle can travel slightly more than 250 miles on a full charge — which is adequate for relatively local hops. But not so much if you’re planning on longer trips with modest stretches between population centers.
2. “Fill-ups” take time. Unless you’re driving an RV or an 18-wheeler, it only takes a few minutes to fill an ICE fuel tank. On the other hand, recharging EV batteries takes much longer. Of course, the charging station is a big factor: a Level 1 charging station (120V) typically takes 40 hours for 200 miles of range, while a Level 2 station (240V) can deliver the same range in eight hours. As for those “high-speed” Level 3 charging stations at offices and commercial places? They still take an hour to deliver 250 miles. As a result …
3. Public charging stations are in high demand. Unfortunately, that means when you find one, they’re usually already occupied. So if you’re, say, second in line, you’ll be waiting somewhere between two to three hours for that “high-speed” charge. Yikes. What’s that old saying about time and money?
4. They’re not environmentally friendly. It takes roughly 3.75 kW of power to dry an average load of laundry. Now compare that with the approximately 50 kW of power required to fully charge a standard range Tesla Model 3 — that’s equivalent to drying more than 13 loads of laundry, not to mention a significant burden on the power grid.
5. Choices are limited. While the internal combustion engine vehicle industry has been around for more than a century, manufacturing lines for modern electric vehicles are far younger. So it shouldn’t be surprising that there are fewer available models to choose from.
6. They’re not very efficient in hot weather. It’s no secret that EV performance degrades on hot days. A recent study by AAA found that with an outside air temp of 95 degrees Fahrenheit and the air conditioning on, EV driving range can decrease by 17%. That could be a problem for someone who wants to travel from Los Angeles to Las Vegas in the middle of August. Then again …
7. They’re not very efficient in cold weather either. Unlike gasoline powered vehicles that can warm the cabin with waste heat, EVs depend solely on their batteries, which reduces their range. In fact, that same AAA study found that the average driving range of electric vehicles decreases by 41% when the outside temp is 20 degrees Fahrenheit — and that may be conservative. During one severe cold snap, owners of Chevy Bolts and Tesla Model 3s told CNBC they saw up to 50% less range.
8. They’re not environmentally friendly (Part 2). The Tesla Model 3 has more than 1000 pounds of batteries loaded with toxic heavy metals. Even worse, those batteries have a limited lifespan — which means you can bet almost all of them will eventually end up in a landfill. (Probably one near you.)
9. Electricity costs will increase with rising demand. It’s a fact; as the number of EVs on the road increases, the demand for electricity will increase as well, driving up operating costs. One reason for that is …
10. The infrastructure to support EVs isn’t there. California’s power grid operators began asking residents in 2021 to “relieve pressure” by charging their EVs during off-peak hours. If this is already a problem when EVs make up a tiny fraction of all cars on the road, what kind of pressure will the grid be subjected to when their popularity increases at even a modest pace? Yes, that pressure might be relieved once the additional infrastructure is in place. But there’s a catch …
11. The infrastructure will be expensive. The wires and charging stations needed to charge all those electric vehicles have to be paid by somebody. Of course, “somebody” will be the ratepayers, driving electricity prices even higher. But wait … it gets better: The wacky environmentalists who want to rid the world of cars with internal combustion engines, are the same people who also oppose the utility-scale solar farms that will be required to help satisfy growing EV demand in the absence of oil, coal and gas-based electricity generation (which they vehemently oppose too).
12. They’re not environmentally friendly (Part 3). By the way, any energy to power EVs that doesn’t come from clean solar, wind or hydroelectric power sources, results in higher CO2 emissions than most people realize because any fossil-fuel generated electricity used to charge those EVs has already released the CO2 “pollution” at the power plant. Which is why …
13. They’re not environmentally friendly (Part 4). A 2018 study by Jonathan Lesser, using data from none other than the US Energy Information Administration, found that “widespread adoption of electric vehicles nationwide will likely increase air pollution compared with new internal combustion vehicles.” Yes; increase pollution.
14. Electric vehicles are expensive. It’s bad enough that EVs are at least 1.6 times more expensive to service than ICE vehicles. You can also expect to pay $10,000 or more for fully-electric models of their gas-powered equivalents; much of this can be attributed to the high cost of EV batteries. And EVs become even more expensive when you realize their batteries need to be replaced approximately every eight years. This is just one reason why:
15. EVs require government subsidies to be competitive with ICE cars. QED.
16. Public charging stations can be difficult to find. While gas stations are ubiquitous, public high speed Level 3 charging stations are still anything but. Unfortunately, you can’t take your home charging station with you on a long road trip — which is really bad news for the psychologically-fragile EV consumer base who suffers from range anxiety. The good news is there’s an expensive — but highly-reliable — portable charger for EVs on the market. Here’s the punchline: It runs on gasoline.
Photo Credit: Ivan Radic
Susan says
I have a friend who is all about living the green life. She bought a brand new Nissan Leaf a few years ago only to turn around and sell it after a little more than a year. Now she drives a gas-powered Honda Fit. I rib her about it all the time.
RD Blakeslee says
17. To produce the raw materials needed to make EV batteries, horrendously dirty hard-rock mining is necessary:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tilakdoshi/2020/08/02/the-dirty-secrets-of-clean-electric-vehicles/?sh=1d3bb2e0650b
Lauren P says
Len, I just read another thought-provoking piece about electric vehicles, this one from Deroy Murdock: https://deroymurdock.com/2021/06/25/murdock-tough-questions-about-electric-vehicles-remain-unasked/
Great (or at least above-average ;o) minds thinking alike!
InhalingCO2 says
Agreed. I am enjoying my electric bicycle alot though. I predict more Electric bikes than electric cars on the road within 5 years. Better exercise, local grocery and errand runs. And fun.
David C says
I am presently using some battery powered lawn implements. But that is as about as far as i am willing to go right now. Although, an E-bike looks fun. But, an EV is not on my horizon anytime soon. There are a few charging stations within a mile of my house, but they are not near any place that I would frequent long enough to get a buzz. And my area’s electrical infrastructure is aging and i suspect not up to the task of adding a bunch of EV’s to the mix.
Of course, I work for an oil company, so I may be a bit biased.
Len Penzo says
Biased? Maybe so … but it seems to me “pragmatic” is probably more accurate. 😀
TnAndy says
I might consider one down the road, when VW comes out with their model in a year or two. It would be a 2nd car for short trips to down, I’d keep our 2011 Suabaru Outback for anything beyond that. I’d charge the EV off our home solar power system.
Our “EV” right now for use around the farm is a golf cart, and we use it every single day.
Julie says
I am currently leasing a Chevy Bolt because it was a great deal, I have a short commute, and we have another vehicle for family trips. The EV is great, but Ill probably go back to a used ICE when my lease is up. I think the thing that environmentalists fail to acknowledge as they push for EVs is that the most environmental thing we can do is to drive old cars and repair them. Setting aside all other factors, it takes more resources to create a whole new vehicle over parts to repair a vehicle that already exists. But Len, even as a current driver of an EV, nice piece!
Harry Meyen says
That’s what many of us thought about the Obama admin’s “Cash For Clunkers” program.
Kenny says
Though I agree with this article completely, I still got an EV. But I think my situation is totally different compared to most folks.
Last year, my employer installed 2 EV chargers and we can use them free of charge. This was interesting because I was spending $140 a month in gas to commute, even after working remote 1 to 2 days a week. After creeping at some EVs since October, I was able to snag a 2020 Bolt for a song. So now my car payment is essentially the money I would have spent on gas anyway plus a couple bucks. Even if I needed to charge at home, which I could since my uncle is an electrician and set me up, the savings is significant.
Now we still need our suv for towing, hauling large items, long trips, etc. but the Bolt pretty much replaced my commuter car anyway so it serves its purpose. Plus my employer said they are putting in 9 more chargers and they will be free to use for the foreseeable future as they claim the cost to them is insignificant.
IMO, they are really at best a second vehicle for local trips only. I would never go full electric.
Jim Reznicowski says
Why were you able to get a Bolt for a song? Because they are garbage. Chevy has recalled all Bolt EVs worldwide due to fire risk. The LG batteries can catch fire, potentially burning your house down if you park inside. Previously recalls for the same problem provided failed solutions. Do not buy GM vehicles.
Buck Fiden says
It takes a lot of fossil fuel to build and operate an EV. I’m still waiting for the Cat D8 EV bulldozer to be revealed.
Kate says
My sister and BIL drive a hybrid, which alternates between gas and electric as needed. We have taken that on long trips a couple of times. That seems like a good compromise.
Bobby says
The current government says we will have all electric vehicles on the road by whatever in the near future. Yea right!! The theory of all electric vehicles is a bunch of bullcrap! Nice write up sir.
Frank says
I hear that the maintenance costs are much less for EVs. For those who don’t do their own maintenance, taking a car to the shop is a huge hassle, and expensive.
While I’m not a fan of taxes, all of these EVs not paying the gas tax will reduce revenues, which will have to be made us somehow.